Monthly Archives: January 2011

3 Browser Based Editors to Watch

In the last couple of weeks, there has been a fair amount of talk about three web based editors. Google has started embeding CodeMirror into Google Project Hosting, IBM is developing Orion, and Mozilla is merging Bespin/SkyWriter into Ace, Cloud9’s editor. Everything from office suites to music players have been migrating online, it seems likely that these editors will be the next category of apps to live in your browser. Will they replace vi, emacs, or TextMate? Probably not any time soon, but they do offer some interesting opportunities, let’s take a look at each of them.


CodeMirror seems to the be one of the oldest browser based editors. If you’re interested in how it’s implemented, there is a great article covering CodeMirror’s creation. The focus so far seems to be around making a decent editor you can embed in existing projects. Of the three editors, it seemed to be the slowest, but also the most versatile, well documented, and mature editor. It is also worth noting that google has been using it for a while in their KML playground, patch submission for Google Project, and the Google API Playground.


Little has been said so far about Orion, and it’s obviously in an early stage, but it sounds like some of the Eclipse team is working on it, which is interesting news. I couldn’t find an online demo, however it’s quite easy to download and run the Orion server. The editor itself is pretty snappy, and already has some unique features such as code annotation. Where as CodeMirror is aimed at embedding in existing pages, Orion is setting out to be a full IDE which handles loading and saving files as well as managing user accounts. The general interface surrounding the editor is quite rudimentary at this point, but what is working so far looks good.

Ace / Cloud9

As I mentioned above, Mozilla’s Bespin/SkyWriter is being merged into Ace, the editor for the Cloud9 IDE . Bespin was a very interesting project, and I think Ace shows some great potential. The editor itself is quite fast, and seems natural to use. There isn’t much information out there concerning the full IDE, so I tried signing up for the hosted beta, but found that you can already download and install Cloud9 the IDE yourself. The Cloud9 IDE let’s you easily serve up any directory and edit it through your browser.  The interface is surprisingly polished, and seems like it could really offer up a good experience in the future.

So where does all this leave us? None of these editors have the additional functionality that we expect in our day to day editors, but the promise of being able to edit files quickly within your browser is interesting.  These editors could decrease some of the barriers to web applications, perhaps becoming as useful as tools like Firebug.  I’m not about to throw out TextMate, but as a web developer, I think these editors will fill a useful niche in the future.


Filed under development, Web Development

The Strange Ruby Splat

This article has been republished on Monkey and Crow.

As of ruby 1.9, you can do some pretty odd things with array destructuring and splatting. Putting the star before an object invokes the splat operator, which has a variety of effects. First we’ll start with some very useful examples, then we will poke around the dark corners of ruby’s arrays and the splat operator.

Method Definitions

You can use a splat in a method definition to gather up any remaining arguments:

  def say(what, *people)
    people.each{|person| puts "#{person}: #{what}"}
  say "Hello!", "Alice", "Bob", "Carl"
  # Alice: Hello!
  # Bob: Hello!
  # Carl: Hello!

In the example above, what will get the first argument, then *people will capture however many other arguments you pass into say. A real world example of this can be found in the definition of Delegator#method_missing. A common ruby idiom is to pass a hash in as the last argument to a method. Rails defines an array helper Array#extract_options! to make this idiom easier to handle with variable argument methods, but you can actually get a similar behavior using a splat at the beginning of the argument list:

  def arguments_and_opts(*args, opts)
    puts "arguments: #{args} options: #{opts}"
  arguments_and_opts 1,2,3, :a=>5
  # arguments: [1, 2, 3] options: {:a=>5}

Now this example only works if you are guaranteed to pass in a hash at the end, but it illustrates that the splat does not need to always come at the end of a method’s parameters. There are also some other odd uses for the splat in method defitions, for instance this is valid:

  def print_pair(a,b,*)
    puts "#{a} and #{b}"
  print_pair 1,2,3,:cake,7
  # 1 and 2

Outside of letting you mimic javascript calling conventions, I’m not sure what the practical use is:

  function print_pair(a,b){ 
    console.log(a + " and " + b);
  print_pair(1,2,3, "cake", 7);
  //=> 1 and 2

Calling Methods

The splat can also be used when calling a method, not just when defining one. If you wanted to use the say method from above, but you have your list of people in an array, the splat can help you out:

  people = ["Rudy", "Sarah", "Thomas"]
  say "Howdy!", *people
  # Rudy: Howdy!
  # Sarah: Howdy!
  # Thomas: Howdy!

In this case, the splat converted the array into method arguments. It doesn’t have to be used with methods that take a variable number of arguments though, you can use it in all kinds of other creative ways:

  def add(a,b)
    a + b
  pair = [3,7]
  add *pair
  # 7

Array Destructuring

First of all, lets quickly cover a few things you can do without splatting:

  a,b = 1,2               # Assign 2 values at once
  a,b = b,a               # Assign values in parallel
  puts "#{a} and #{b}"
  # 2 and 1

With the above samples in mind, let’s try some fancier stuff. You can use splats with multiple assignment to extract various elements from a list:

  first, *list = [1,2,3,4]          # first= 1, list= [2,3,4]
  *list, last  = [1,2,3,4]          # list= [1,2,3], last= 4
  first, *center, last = [1,2,3,4]  # first= 1, center= [2,3], last=4
  # Unquote a String (don't do this)
  _, *unquoted, _ = '"quoted"'.split(//)
  puts unquoted.join
  # quoted

Array Coercion

If for some reason the previous examples seemed like great ideas to you, you’ll be thrilled to know that the splat can also be used to coerce values into arrays:

  a = *"Hello"  #=> ["Hello"]
  "Hello".to_a  #=> NoMethodError: undefined method `to_a' for "Hello":String
  a = *(1..3)   #=> [1, 2, 3]
  a = *[1,2,3]  #=> [1, 2, 3]

This can be a nice way to make sure that a value is always an array, especially since it will handle objects that do not implement to_a

The splat is a wily beast popping up in odd corners of ruby. I rarely actually use it outside of in method definitions and method calls, but it’s interesting to know that it is available. Have you found any useful idioms that make use of the splat? I would love to hear about them.


Filed under development, ruby

Getting to Know the Ruby Standard Library – Delegator

This article has been republished on Monkey and Crow.

Today we will examine ruby’s implementation of the Proxy pattern, with the Delegator class. We have already seen and example of it in use with WeakRef. A Delegator can be used when you want to intercept calls to some object without concerning the caller. For example we can use a Delegator to hide the latency from http calls or other slow code:

  require 'delegate'

  class Future < SimpleDelegator
    def initialize(&block)
      @_thread = Thread.start(&block)

    def __getobj__
      __setobj__(@_thread.value) if @_thread.alive?


The Future will invoke whatever is passed to it without blocking the rest of your code until you try to access the result. You could use it to issue several http requests and then process them later:

  require 'net/http'
  # These will each execute immediately
  google ={ Net::HTTP.get_response(URI('')).body  }
  yahoo  ={ Net::HTTP.get_response(URI('')).body  }

  # These will block until their requests have loaded
  puts google
  puts yahoo

In this example, google and yahoo will both spawn threads, however when we try to print them, the Future instance will block until the thread is done, and then pass on method calls to the result of our http call. You can grab the code from github and give it try yourself. Lets take a look at how Delegator works. Open up the source, and follow along, if you have Qwandry installed qw delegate will do the trick.

The file delegate.rb defines two classes, Delegator, an abstract class, and SimpleDelegator which implements the missing methods in Delegator. Let’s look at the first few lines of Delegator:

  class Delegator
    [:to_s,:inspect,:=~,:!~,:===].each do |m|
      undef_method m

You will notice that a block of code is being executed as part of the ruby class definition. This is entirely valid, and will be executed in the scope of the Delegator class. undef_method is called to remove the default implementations of some common methods defined by Object. We will see why in a little bit. Next up is the initializer:

  def initialize(obj)

The method __setobj__ might look strange, but it is just a normal method with an obscure name. When a Delegator is instantiated, the object it is delegating to is stored away with __setobj__. Next look at how Delegator implements method_missing, and you’ll see what all the prep work was for:

  def method_missing(m, *args, &block)
      target = self.__getobj__
      unless target.respond_to?(m)
        super(m, *args, &block)
        target.__send__(m, *args, &block)

method_missing is defined on Object, and will be called any time that you try to call method that is not defined. This is the key to how Delegator works, any methods not defined on Delegator are handled by this method. Before we dive into this, we should be aware of what the arguments to method_missing are. The m is the missing method’s name as a symbol. The args are zero or more arguments that would have been passed to that method. The &block is the block that the method was called with, or nil if no block was given.

The first thing method_missing does here is call __getobj__. We’ve already seen __setobj__, it sets the object that Delegator wraps, so we can reason that __getobj__ gets it. Once the wrapped object has been obtained, it checks to see if that object implements the method we want to call. If not, then we call Object#method_missing, which is going to raise an exception. If the wrapped object does implement our method, then it passes it on. The methods that were undefined earlier are guaranteed to be passed on to the wrapped object, and the odd looking __getobj__ and __setobj__ are unlikely to collide with any other object’s methods. Ruby’s flexibility really shines in this example, in just a few lines of code, we get a very useful class that can be used to implement advanced behavior.

Now let’s figure out why there are two classes defined here. If you look down at Delegator#__setobj__ and Delegator#__getobj__ we’ll see something interesting:

  def __getobj__
    raise NotImplementedError, "need to define `__getobj__'"
  def __setobj__(obj)
    raise NotImplementedError, "need to define `__setobj__'"

Neither of these methods are implemented, effectively making Delegator an abstract class. For connivence, SimpleDelegator implements them in a reasonable manner. There are a few other special methods defined on Delegator as well:

  def ==(obj)
    return true if obj.equal?(self)
    self.__getobj__ == obj

First Delegator checks for equality against itself, then it checks it against the wrapped object. This way == will return true if you pass in either the wrapped object, or the delegate itself. In this same manner you can intercept calls to specific methods, or override Delegator#method_missing to intercept all calls.

We have learned about a powerful design pattern that is easily implemented in ruby. We also saw a very good use for ruby’s method_missing. How have you used Delegator or found similar proxy patterns in ruby?


Filed under ruby, stdlib

Getting to Know the Ruby Standard Library – WeakRef

This article has been republished on Monkey and Crow.

Once again, we shall dive into the depths of ruby’s standard library and fish WeakRef out. First we’ll talk about garbage collection, then try WeakRef out, and then investigate how it works.

In the course of a normal script’s execution, tons of objects are created, used, and then thrown away. When an object is not referenced by any other objects, the garbage collector can safely toss it. Occasionally we may want to keep track of an object, but not insist on it staying in memory. I can think of two cases when you want to have a reference to an object, but don’t mind if it gets collected. The first is if you are maintaining a cache, but its contents are not essential:

  require 'weakref'

  class TransientCache < Hash
    class AmbivalentRef < WeakRef
      def __getobj__
        super rescue nil
    def []= key, object
    def [] key
      ref = super(key)
      self.delete(key) if !ref.weakref_alive?

This cache is just a normal Hash, but any time we put an object into it, we store a weak reference to that object. For the moment ignore the AmbivalentRef, I’ll get to that when we look at how WeakRef is implemented. Grab the source for TransientCache, and lets try it out:

  c =

  x = "important"
  c[:a] = "Hello"
  c[:b] =
  c[:x] = x

  # Lets see what was in the cache
  c[:a].inspect #=> "Hello"
  c[:b].inspect #=> #<Object:0x000001009fc780>
  c[:x].inspect #=> "important"               

  # Now what's left?
  c[:a].inspect #=> nil
  c[:b].inspect #=> #<Object:0x000001009fc780>
  c[:x].inspect #=> "important"

We manually forced the garbage collector to run, and as you can see it removed the value stored in :a. We expect the value in : x to stay since the variable x is still in scope. What about :b though? The garbage collector may or may not throw out old objects, in this case it looks like it didn’t feel like tossing the value stored in :b just yet.

Weak references are also useful when implementing listeners, observers, or the Pub/Sub pattern. You may wish to read Dan Schultz’s summary even though it pertains to ActionScript, the same principles hold true for ruby.

Now that you know a bit about what WeakRef is good for, let’s take a look at how it works. If you have Qwandry installed, follow along with qw weakref.

class WeakRef < Delegator
  def initialize(orig)
    @__id = orig.object_id
    ObjectSpace.define_finalizer orig, @@final
    ObjectSpace.define_finalizer self, @@final

We see that WeakRef inherits from Delegator, which sets up a pattern for one object to pass method calls on to another object without the invoker needing to know. A Delegator takes an object to wrap as a parameter, which we see is orig in this case. WeakRef keeps the id of the original object so that it can identify it later. The next to calls are finalizers, which you may not have come across in ruby before. Finalizers are called when the garbage collector frees an object. In this case @@final will be called when either orig or the WeakRef is collected. We’ll come back to to the finalizers after we see what else WeakRef is keeping track of:

    @@mutex.synchronize {
      @@id_map[@__id] = [] unless @@id_map[@__id]
    @@id_map[@__id].push self.object_id
    @@id_rev_map[self.object_id] = @__id

A mutex is used to make sure that multiple threads attempting to modify @@id_map don’t all occur at the same time. @@id_map is going to store an array of references to WeakRef instances by id. Meanwhile, @@id_rev_map stores a reference back to the original object’s id. You might be wondering what all this record keeping is for by now. If WeakRef just contained a reference to the wrapped object directly, then the WeakRef would prevent the original object from getting collected, however @@id_map and @@id_rev_map only store references as integers that can be used to lookup the original. This indirection is at the core of how weak references are implemented in ruby. Since we are thinking about this indirection, lets see what happens when you access a WeakRef:

  def __getobj__
    unless @@id_rev_map[self.object_id] == @__id
      Kernel::raise RefError, "Invalid Reference - probably recycled", Kernel::caller(2)

__getobj__ is called by Delegator whenever it wants to obtain the wrapped object, we can see here that WeakRef double checks its internal mapping of ids with @@id_rev_map[self.object_id] == @__id. If the resulting id isn’t what the WeakRef expected, it will throw an exception, otherwise it uses ObjectSpace._id2ref to fetch original object. You can try this yourself in irb:

"Cats".object_id                    #=> 2152560480 
ObjectSpace._id2ref 2152560480      #=> "Cats"

So now we know how WeakRef fetches its original object back for you without keeping a direct reference that would prevent it from being garbage collected.

Now lets take a look at that finalizer referenced in the initialize. There are two possible situations, either an original object was destroyed, or a WeakRef was destroyed. Lets look at the first case:

      rids = @@id_map[id]
      if rids
	      for rid in rids

In this case, the id is in @@id_map, and we get back a list of WeakRef ids that mapped to that original object. Each of those reference ids will be removed from the list of WeakRef instances (@@id_rev_map), and then finally their array is removed. Now for the second case where a WeakRef was collected:

      rid = @@id_rev_map[id]
      if rid
	      @@id_map.delete(rid) if @@id_map[rid].empty?

If this was the situation, then it’s entry in the list of WeakRef instances is removed. If this was the last WeakRef pointing to the original object, then then mapping is removed.

So now that you know the ins and outs of WeakRef, let’s look back at the original example. We defined an AmbivalentRef which just returned nil instead of an exception if it wasn’t found. The TransientCache sample didn’t really care if the original object had been collected, if it has, then we just return a cache miss. If you use a WeakRef in your code, you should be aware that an exception will be raised if you try to access a collected object.


Filed under ruby, stdlib